<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Northrop Grumman and Others Call for Administration to Name Cyber Czar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gotgeoint.com/archives/northrop-grumman-and-others-call-for-administration-to-name-cyber-czar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gotgeoint.com/archives/northrop-grumman-and-others-call-for-administration-to-name-cyber-czar/</link>
	<description>Welcome to got geoint? - The official blog of USGIF. Explore and respond to all things Geospatial Intelligence, and also connect with us using one or all of the social groups!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FiLu</title>
		<link>http://www.gotgeoint.com/archives/northrop-grumman-and-others-call-for-administration-to-name-cyber-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>FiLu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gotgeoint.com/?p=1813#comment-807</guid>
		<description>As the crisis in cybersecurity is equally pressing to industry as well as national security, funding, and brains, immutably should come from these sectors. Each has an agenda but together a proactive offense, new concept, and ongoing defense could be developed. Passivity is NOT the answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the crisis in cybersecurity is equally pressing to industry as well as national security, funding, and brains, immutably should come from these sectors. Each has an agenda but together a proactive offense, new concept, and ongoing defense could be developed. Passivity is NOT the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodo Lurker</title>
		<link>http://www.gotgeoint.com/archives/northrop-grumman-and-others-call-for-administration-to-name-cyber-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodo Lurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gotgeoint.com/?p=1813#comment-805</guid>
		<description>Cyber security has to be 100% priority. I think also having a disaster plan prepared in the event of a cyber attack is even more important. We all know what it is like to lose our hard drives...imagine that happening at a national level. It would be devastating. It seems to be part of the American mindset to address disasters/emergencies only after they occurred (think of all the actions taken to address future 9/11 and Katrinas - after they occurred, we developed plenty of plans and protocols). Anyways, we need to be prepared to defend against preemptive cyber  attacks but we also need to be ready for the aftermath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyber security has to be 100% priority. I think also having a disaster plan prepared in the event of a cyber attack is even more important. We all know what it is like to lose our hard drives&#8230;imagine that happening at a national level. It would be devastating. It seems to be part of the American mindset to address disasters/emergencies only after they occurred (think of all the actions taken to address future 9/11 and Katrinas &#8211; after they occurred, we developed plenty of plans and protocols). Anyways, we need to be prepared to defend against preemptive cyber  attacks but we also need to be ready for the aftermath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

